Skip to content

Conversation

@randygrok
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Performance improvement
  • Refactoring

Related Issues

Fixes #(issue)

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published

Testing

Additional Notes

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Claude finished @randygrok's task —— View job


PR Review in Progress

I'll provide a comprehensive review of this large PR implementing ADR 003. Let me analyze the changes systematically:

Review Tasks

  • Analyze overall architecture and design changes
  • Review new ev-primitives crate for transaction handling
  • Examine EVM execution modifications in ev-revm
  • Check RPC and payload service implementations
  • Assess security considerations for transaction processing
  • Evaluate error handling and validation
  • Review performance implications
  • Check test coverage adequacy

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants